United States v. Rodrigo Mendoza-Reyes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• review of voir dire is for plain error where defendant does not object
• “[I]f any juror had the impression that the Court was 5 commenting on the evidence, such an impression would have been corrected by the Court’s multiple instructions relating to the burden of proof, the presumption of innocence, and the jury’s duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).