United States v. Rodolfo Espinoza Abarca, United States of America v. Espinoza Rodolfo Abarca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant may waive statutory right to file 2255 petition challenging length of his sentence
• holding that appeal waiver barred challenge to district’s court’s denial of sentence modification based on newly discovered evidence
• holding that, by entering plea agreement whereby defendant waived right to 2 appeal his sentence, defendant relinquished right to directly or collaterally attack his 3 sentence on the ground of newly discovered exculpatory evidence
• holding that, by entering 19 plea agreement whereby defendant waived right to appeal his sentence, defendant 20 relinquished right to directly or collaterally attack his sentence on the ground of newly 21 discovered exculpatory evidence
• holding that, by entering a plea agreement whereby 6 defendant waived right to appeal his sentence, defendant relinquished right to directly or 7 collaterally attack his sentence on the ground of newly discovered exculpatory evidence
• holding that, by entering plea agreement whereby defendant waived right to 28 1 appeal his sentence, defendant relinquished right to directly or collaterally attack his 2 sentence on the ground of newly discovered exculpatory evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).