United States v. Rodney McGilvery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that McGilvery’s waiver was valid when “the prosecutor summarized the terms of the plea agreement and specifically explained that McGilvery agreed to waive his right to appellate review”
• holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider McGilvery’s appeal because he had waived his appellate rights in the plea agreement
• holding that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction to hear the defendant’s appeal because the defendant waived his right to appeal in the plea agreement
• holding that McGilvery’s waiver was valid when “the prosecutor summarized the terms of the plea agreement and specifically explained that McGilvery agreed to waive his right to appellate review”
• holding a waiver valid and “strongly encouraging” No. 06-6504 United States v. Coker Page 9 the government to file a motion to dismiss the appeal in similar future cases to avoid wasting time and resources
• encouraging the government to file in this court a motion to dismiss the appeal whenever the defendant has agreed to an appellate waiver, as it would facilitate referral to a motions panel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).