United States v. Rodney Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s “persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel” was a valid waiver of the right to counsel
• holding that the defendant’s “persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel functioned as a valid waiver of the right to counsel.”
• holding that a defendant’s “persistent, unreasonable demand for dismissal of counsel and appointment of new counsel functioned as a valid waiver of the right to counsel”
• denying that counsel provided ineffective assistance by coercing defendant to plead guilty because “accurate information regarding the possible ramifications of proceeding to trial cannot be constructed as coercive”
• “The Sixth Amendment right to counsel ‘does not guarantee that a criminal defendant will be represented by a particular attorney’”
• “[A]ccurate information regarding the possible ramifications of proceeding to trial cannot be construed as coercive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).