United States v. Rodney E. Hemmings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Van Brandy and finding that the Government did not violate the Speedy Trial Act by filing a superseding indictment more than forty days before trial
• upholding 922(g)(1) and (9) in the face of a Second Amendment attack
• applying Cox, 260 U.S. 427, to the Ex Post Facto Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).