United States v. Rodger Wagoner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[i]t was incumbent upon [the defendant] to obtain a ruling upon his motion [to exclude evidence] and having failed to do so leaves nothing for review.”
• where defendant did not raise an objection at trial regarding the admissibility of evidence, court can only review whether admission amounted to plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).