Fourth Circuit· 1/3/2023
United States v. Roderick Williams
Citations
- 56 F.4th 366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Rule 60(b)(3)’s one-year time limit is a mandatory claim-processing rule that cannot be tolled
- concluding that “Rule 60(b)’s one-year time limit is mandatory” and that courts are “without discretion to extend [the] one-year time limit for equitable reasons, whatever their metit”’
- holding that equitable tolling does not apply to Rule 60(b)(3) motions
- explaining that “the grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) are ‘mutually exclusive’ from the grounds of other Rule 60(b
- “[T]he one-year limit is an outer limit of what may be timely.” (emphasis in original)
- “the grounds for Rule 60(b) (6) are mutually exclusive from the grounds of other Rule 60(b) motions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-06-23· cited 1,032×
- Harbison v. BellSupreme Court· 2009-04-01· cited 531×
- Kenneth Bernard Rouse v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 531×
- United States v. Madison McRaeFourth Circuit· 2015-07-13· cited 460×
- Kemp v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2022-06-13· cited 426×
- Aikens v. IngramFourth Circuit· 2011-07-13· cited 292×
- David Warren v. Henry Garvin, Supt. Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, Robert HanslmaierSecond Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 235×
- Lester C. McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel & Company, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1991-02-26· cited 104×
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. LambertSupreme Court· 2019-02-26· cited 104×
- In Re: G.A.D., Incorporated, Debtor. Donna Eglinton v. Hugh Loyer and George ChapelSixth Circuit· 2003-08-13· cited 74×
- Mary Fox v. Elk Run Coal Company, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 2014-01-03· cited 53×
- Rumsey Land Company v. Resource Land HoldingsTenth Circuit· 2019-12-20· cited 43×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1982-04-12· cited 35×
- United States v. Charles William McHanFourth Circuit· 2004-10-22· cited 33×
- United States v. Kirk MarshFourth Circuit· 2019-12-09· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.