United States v. Roderick K. Dirden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the third factor weighed against a defendant who moved for a continuance and acquiesced when the trial date was vacated twice
• “The defenses truly must be mutually exclusive, such that the jury could not believe the core of one defense without discounting entirely the core of the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).