United States v. Roderick J. MacKenzie Malcolm L. MacKenzie and David H. MacKenzie Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting 21 the inference of “knowledge of the law” from the “[d]efendants’ backgrounds,” including 22 education
• “Defendants’ backgrounds (each had a college degree, Roderick in economics and Malcolm in business) also demonstrate the likelihood they knew what the law required.”
• “Defendants’ backgrounds (each had a college degree, Roderick in economics and Malcolm in business) also demonstrate the likelihood they knew what the law required.”
• conduct and education of defendants supported inference of knowledge of law
• order on petition for rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).