United States v. Rockford Memorial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the merged entity would control 68.2% of the GAC market based on patient admissions or 72.4% based on patient days
• court acknowledged general efficacy of the E-H test but criticized defendants' result-oriented application of the test
• “In other words, the Lofi and Lifo figures should ideally yield at least percentages of 90% or greater.”
• “[T]he standardization of clinical practices does not require a merger.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).