Skip to main content
· 5/30/1991

United States v. Rocco Ernest Infelise

Citations

  • 934 F.2d 103
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10890
  • 1991 WL 89862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the defendant “must show that either the prosecution or the court has unnecessarily delayed in bringing the case to trial”
  • discussing due process vis- à-vis pretrial detention under the Bail Reform Act
  • continued detention approved where defendants expected to be detained two years until end of trial, as delay was caused by time defense counsel took to prepare defense and neither prosecution nor court system were implicated in delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.