United States v. Robling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] plaintiff need not be given leave to amend if he fails to specify . . . how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in his complaint.” (cleaned up)
• “Melendez's argument regarding hypothetical facts would not allow his claims to survive a motion to dismiss because factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.”
• denial of leave to amend based on futility is reviewed de novo
• “Although preemption is an affirmative defense, this doctrine ‘can still support a motion to dismiss if the [relevant preemption] statute’s barrier to suit is evident from the face of the complaint.’” (quoting Ricci v. Teamsters Union Loc. 456, 781 F.3d 25, 28 (2d Cir. 2015))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).