Skip to main content
· 10/8/2004

United States v. Roberto Rosario

Citations

  • 386 F.3d 166
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20985
  • 2004 WL 2255350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where the written judgment required court approval for an exemption to a special condition to apply but the oral ruling required no such approval
  • “It is well settled, as a general proposition, that in the event of variation between an oral pronouncement of sentence and a subsequent written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Calabresi, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.