· 10/8/2004
United States v. Roberto Rosario
Citations
- 386 F.3d 166
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20985
- 2004 WL 2255350
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding where the written judgment required court approval for an exemption to a special condition to apply but the oral ruling required no such approval
- “It is well settled, as a general proposition, that in the event of variation between an oral pronouncement of sentence and a subsequent written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Calabresi, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.