United States v. Roberto Martinez-Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing a juror’s failure to respond to a question framed in the negative as a commitment by that juror to follow the law, thus rehabilitating him
• construing a juror’s failure to respond to a question framed in the negative as a commitment by that juror to follow the law, thus rehabilitating him
• analyzing a due process claim for “fail[ure] to collect and preserve evidence” (emphasis added)
• analyzing a due process claim for “fail[ure] to collect and preserve evidence” (emphasis added)
• \[T]he ‘cumulative error’ analysis is inapposite to this case. Defendant has failed to demonstrate any erroneous decisions by the trial court.\
• “[T]he ‘cumulative error’ analysis is inapposite to this case. Defendant has failed to demonstrate any erroneous decisions by the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).