Skip to main content
· 12/19/2006

United States v. Robert White

Citations

  • 472 F.3d 458
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 31144
  • 2006 WL 3720254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Booker does not require facts found at sentencing to be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt as long as the factual findings do not increase the defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum for the offense of conviction
  • finding the defen- dant was not denied a fair trial in part because the district court allowed the defendant to argue his theory of defense to the jury
  • “This court’s workload increases dramatically if an appeal is transformed into a scav- enger hunt in search of a copy of the judgment below or the transcript page where a challenged decision was explained by the district court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.