Skip to main content
· 2/11/2005

United States v. Robert Washington

Citations

  • 398 F.3d 306
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2241
  • 2005 WL 326986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing error resulting in five months extra imprisonment
  • noting the error in the petitioner’s sentence because, among other things, “the facts remain that a sentence has yet to be imposed under a regime in which the Guidelines are treated as advisory” (quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Luttig, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.