United States v. Robert Walker Gupton, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under Section 1951(a) prohibition of a plan to obstruct commerce by extortion there need be shown only a plan to embark upon a course of extortionate conduct likely to have the natural effect of obstructing commerce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Julita De Parias, Jessie Ramirez, A/K/A Marzelo Romdom, A/K/A Norbey Duque Garcia and \Jessid\
  Eleventh Circuit· 1986-12-15· cited 106×
• United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John Lee
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-11-22· cited 91×
• United States v. Jack Warledo, Johnson Warledo, Thomas Lee Ahaisse, Gary Larney and Meredith Malcolm Quinn
  Tenth Circuit· 1977-06-17· cited 63×
• United States v. Peter R. Farrell and Paul A. Farrell
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-07-17· cited 33×
• United States v. Charles Winfred Carpenter, Jr.
  Fifth Circuit· 1980-03-07· cited 23×
• United States v. Bryson
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1975-05-21· cited 5×
• United States v. Nghia Le
  Eleventh Circuit· 2001-07-11· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• United States v. Addonizio
  Third Circuit· 1972-02-22· cited 80×