United States v. Robert W. Lee, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “video surveillance may involve a greater intrusion on privacy than audio surveillance”
• use of an audio- video recording device in the defendant’s hotel room did not violate the Fourth Amendment, while consenting informant, who had rented the room for the defendant, was present
• finding no “constitutional distinction between consensual audio and video surveillance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).