· 10/16/1991
United States v. Robert W. Hicks
Citations
- 947 F.2d 1356
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 12672
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8317
- 68 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5762
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24345
- 1991 WL 206849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding 17 that the Paperwork Reduction Act applies to “agency activity,” and does not repeal 18 a “statutory requirement that [a] citizen provide information”
- affirming conviction for failing to file a return, finding requirement to provide information is required by statute, not by the IRS
- “It is the tax code itself, without reference to regulations, that imposes the duty to file a tax return.”
- “It is the tax code itself, without reference to regulations, that imposes the duty to file a tax return.”
- PRA does not constitute a defense to prosecution for failing to file Federal income tax returns
- IRS forms are not \rules\ within the meaning of the APA and need not be published in the Federal Register
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Sneed, Kelleher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.