Ninth Circuit· 10/16/1991
United States v. Robert W. Hicks
Citations
- 947 F.2d 1356
- 91 Daily Journal DAR 12672
- 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8317
- 68 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5762
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24345
- 1991 WL 206849
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding 17 that the Paperwork Reduction Act applies to “agency activity,” and does not repeal 18 a “statutory requirement that [a] citizen provide information”
- affirming conviction for failing to file a return, finding requirement to provide information is required by statute, not by the IRS
- “It is the tax code itself, without reference to regulations, that imposes the duty to file a tax return.”
- “It is the tax code itself, without reference to regulations, that imposes the duty to file a tax return.”
- PRA does not constitute a defense to prosecution for failing to file Federal income tax returns
- IRS forms are not \rules\ within the meaning of the APA and need not be published in the Federal Register
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Sneed, Kelleher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ronald James, and Kay James v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1992-07-23· cited 93×
- United States v. Stephen W. BentsonNinth Circuit· 1991-10-16· cited 74×
- United States v. Donald W. Dawes and Phyllis C. DawesTenth Circuit· 1991-12-17· cited 35×
- United States v. Ted A. NeffEleventh Circuit· 1992-02-28· cited 30×
- United States v. Sanford G. KnappSeventh Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 21×
- United States v. William DrogeSecond Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 13×
- United States v. Arthur H. Ryan, IIISeventh Circuit· 1992-07-21· cited 12×
- United States v. Edward S. NielsenNinth Circuit· 1993-07-29· cited 11×
- United States v. Kun Yun JhoE.D. Texas· 2006-12-04· cited 11×
- United States v. GrossSixth Circuit· 2010-11-10· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-28· cited 7×
- United States v. SinghDistrict of Columbia· 1997-04-25· cited 7×
- United States v. Lula Mae HobbsNinth Circuit· 1993-04-16· cited 4×
- United States v. Ionia Management S.A.D. Connecticut· 2007-07-30· cited 4×
- United States v. James F. Stiner and Christine Louise StinerTenth Circuit· 1992-01-17· cited 3×
- United States v. WashingtonS.D. New York· 1996-11-12· cited 2×
- Gossner Foods, Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyD. Utah· 1996-03-05· cited 1×
- United States v. BennettThird Circuit· 2009-07-08· cited 1×
- United States v. StreetThird Circuit· 2010-03-11· cited 1×
- United States v. PriestNinth Circuit· 2007-07-05· cited 1×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,878×
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyNinth Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 1,819×
- Dole v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court· 1990-02-21· cited 352×
- United States v. Erwin R. WunderSixth Circuit· 1990-09-28· cited 225×
- United States v. Bruce Smith, United States of America v. Roberta BlairNinth Circuit· 1989-01-23· cited 57×
- United States v. Bruno F. SinigaglioNinth Circuit· 1991-08-20· cited 41×
- United States v. Daniel T. HashimotoNinth Circuit· 1989-09-11· cited 36×
- United States v. Ruben ReinisNinth Circuit· 1986-07-14· cited 35×
- United States v. Donald L. Bowers Janet E. BowersFourth Circuit· 1990-12-06· cited 30×
- United States v. Richard K. HatchNinth Circuit· 1990-11-29· cited 12×
- United States v. John T. ClintonNinth Circuit· 1978-05-03· cited 8×
- United States v. BurdettE.D. New York· 1991-07-30· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.