United States v. Robert Triplett, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “findi[ng] limiting guidance” in warrant allowing search of electronic devices where it “inform[ed] the officers that the proper electronic memory devices” to be seized were those “relevant ‘to locate [defendant’s stepdaughter]’”
• “[r]easonable specificity is required, not ‘elaborate detail’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).