United States v. Robert Sylvester Waddell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring the trial court to “make a searching inquiry into the validity and extent of [the witness’s] Fifth Amendment claims”
• “The law is that Smith, if he was a paid Government informer, could entrap Waddell, even though no Government officer knew of Smith’s actions, because the Government is deemed to have constructive knowledge 19 1993

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).