Skip to main content
· 5/13/1988

United States v. Robert Socey and Daniel Socey

Citations

  • 846 F.2d 1439
  • 269 U.S. App. D.C. 453
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6392
  • 1988 WL 47396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing “that the warrantless entry was limited in scope and proportionate to the exigency excusing the warrant requirement”
  • reasonable belief that evidence inside a home will be destroyed can be established by showing “1
  • probable cause and exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into a home
  • exigency in warrantless search context
  • exigency in warrantless search context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson, Ginsburg, Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.