United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Krilich Companies, Incorporated, Riverwoods Development Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over the EPA's [Clean Water Act Section 301(a
• Krilich could not “assail the district court’s subject matter jurisdiction because he entered into a consent decree in which he agreed that the waters involved were ‘waters of the United States.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).