Skip to main content
· 3/2/1990

United States v. Robert Penson and Harley G. Surratt

Citations

  • 896 F.2d 1087
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 978
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2974
  • 1990 WL 18048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identical jury instruction held to cover essential elements of case, thus no error to omit defendant’s proposed mere presence instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cummings, Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.