Skip to main content
· 1/23/2001

United States v. Robert Ofcky

Citations

  • 237 F.3d 904
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 841
  • 2001 WL 55483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court “met all the standards required for the [obstruction-of-justice] enhancement” when it weighed the conflicting testimony and concluded that the defendant committed perjury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Easterbrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.