United States v. Robert Nicholas Angleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he dual sovereignty doctrine ... exists independently of any interaction between sovereigns”
• “Collateral estoppel is inapplicable here, because the United States and Texas, as separate sovereigns, are not the ‘same party.’”
• “Collateral estoppel is inapplicable here, because the United States and Texas, as separate sovereigns, are not the ‘same party.’ ”
• “The Bartkus Court’s failure to identify a particular instance of a sham prosecution may mean that the exception does not exist.”
• collateral estoppel did not bar federal prosecution after unsuccessful state prosecution, citing dual sovereignty doctrine
• collateral estoppel did not bar federal prosecution after unsuccessful state prosecution, citing dual sovereignty doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).