United States v. Robert Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding \a basic mismatch between Miller's wholesale reliance on his privacy interest in the boxes and his challenge to the seizure of those boxes\
• “It is well established that the reasonableness of a seizure turns on the nature and extent of interference with possessory . . . interests.”
• testimony about non-charged instances of fraud were probative of intent where defendant was charged with real estate investment fraud scheme
• D.C. Circuit’s “general practice” is to remand colorable IAC claims “raised for the first time on direct appeal”
• “In the event of an STA violation, the district court retains discretion to determine ‘whether to dismiss the case with or without prejudice’ based on three statutory factors.”
• testimony from prospective home buyers that defendant defrauded them was intrinsic to charged scheme to obtain “moneys, funds and property from . . . prospective home buyers” by fraudulent means (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).