United States v. Robert Melvin Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing circumstances in which it may be an abuse of discretion to exclude expert testimony
• reliability of identification causes greater concern where case “involves one identification, by one witness, under stress”
• \The exclusion of expert testi- mony under Rule 702 is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.\
• “[A]ny discrepancies in these testimonies were brought out or could have been brought out on cross-examination.”
• recognized such evidence admissible under “narrow” circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).