United States v. Robert McNatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of the defendant's refusal to consent to search was admissible to respond to the defendant's claim that police planted evidence, not as an inference of guilt
• holding that evidence of the defendant's refusal to consent to search was admissible to respond to the defendant's claim that police planted evidence, not as an inference of guilt
• holding that A-3692-15T1 27 evidence of the defendant's refusal to consent to search was admissible to respond to the defendant's claim that police planted evidence, not as an inference of guilt
• finding that the information provided by the known, reliable informant was sufficient to establish probable cause under Gates because the information was specific in nature and corroborated by the police
• remarking that \any use of specific instances of conduct ... is committed to the discretion of the trial court\
• finding that testimony regarding the defendant's refusal to consent to a search of his vehicle was \invited” by his suggestion at trial that the arresting officer \framed” him by planting drugs in the defendant's truck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).