Skip to main content
· 7/17/1979

United States v. Robert Mattson

Citations

  • 600 F.2d 1295
  • 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 13138

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • foreseeable and unforseen segregative impact of intentionally discriminatory act constitutes part of constitutional violation
  • “Where interference with national security has been at issue, courts have also relied on the doctrine to reach the merits of the controversy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Anderson, Takasugi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.