Skip to main content
· 2/2/1999

United States v. Robert Lorge, AKA Bobby

Citations

  • 166 F.3d 516
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 1386
  • 1999 WL 41076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting word “includes” in Application Note 1 to mean that section 2G2.2(b)(2) covers deliveries motivated by non-pecuniary goals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Jacobs, Pooler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.