United States v. Robert Lee Miller, A/K/A Charles W. Raven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unauthenticated state court records were admissible
• admission of hearsay statement from probation officer and of unauthenticated copies of state court criminal records did not deny due process
• admission of hearsay statement from probation officer and of unauthenticated copies of state court criminal records did not deny due process
• parole revocation hearing is not to be “equated with a criminal prosecution”
• state probation report, among other evidence, was sufficient to establish probation violation
• probation officer’s testimony appeared reliable and was not refuted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).