· 9/6/1990
United States v. Robert L. Rhodes
Citations
- 913 F.2d 839
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695
- 1990 WL 127182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
- assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
- assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
- “Rule 11 is satis- fied when a court informs the defendant of the maximum and minimum statutory sentences.”
- \Defendant bears the burden of showing a fair and just reason' for withdrawal of his plea.\
- “The fact that the applicable Sentencing Guideline range was higher than defense counsel estimated, however, does not demonstrate a violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKay, Seth, Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.