Skip to main content
· 9/6/1990

United States v. Robert L. Rhodes

Citations

  • 913 F.2d 839
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15695
  • 1990 WL 127182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
  • assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
  • assessing voluntariness of plea in light of attorney’s alleged material misstatements about likely length of sentence and then reviewing ineffectiveness claim separately, under Strickland
  • “Rule 11 is satis- fied when a court informs the defendant of the maximum and minimum statutory sentences.”
  • \Defendant bears the burden of showing a fair and just reason' for withdrawal of his plea.\
  • “The fact that the applicable Sentencing Guideline range was higher than defense counsel estimated, however, does not demonstrate a violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKay, Seth, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.