Skip to main content
· 8/8/1990

United States v. Robert Johnson, United States of America v. Miguel Ramirez, A/K/A Lucas Gonzales, United States of America v. Robert Johnson

Citations

  • 906 F.2d 1285

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming increase where defendant recruited one coconspirator, directed deliveries of cocaine to Chicago, and supplied all cocaine for distribution network
  • affirming role enhancement where defendant recruited, supplied, and directed others in drug distribution scheme
  • “We grant the sentencing court great deference when reviewing its evaluation of a defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.”
  • “Normally the denial of a pretrial motion to suppress evidence preserves the objection for appeal and defense counsel need not renew the objection at trial.”
  • Consistent with Pinkerton, “[t]he district court instructed the jury that if it found a defendant guilty of the conspiracy, it could find the defendant guilty of the substantive offense charged . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Heaney, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.