Skip to main content
· 9/21/1994

United States v. Robert James Ritchie

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 1477
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26391
  • 1994 WL 511750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing \that in some instances the existence of a warrant based on probable cause would not\ provide an individualized suspicion of criminal activity
  • noting that a lack of force or threat of force weighed against a conclusion the defendant was in custody
  • recognizing “that in some instances the existence of a warrant based on probable cause would not” provide an individualized suspicion of criminal activity
  • holding actual possession of search warrant not necessary to commence search where officers know warrant has been issued and another officer en route with warrant
  • providing that officers are not required to evaluate circumstances “each and every time they wish to detain the occupant of the place to be searched” pursuant to warrant
  • noting that police officers present at Mr. Ritchie's residence while awaiting a search warrant stopped Mr. Ritchie as he attempted to leave, explained that they would be detaining him while they awaited a warrant to search his residence, and \performed a quick pat-down search.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, McKay, Baldock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.