United States v. Robert J. Knorr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s misunderstanding that he might be subject to a four- level increase in offense level based on his leadership position in a drug organization was not a fair and just reason to allow withdrawal of guilty plea
• stating that the defendant waived his Rule 32 rights by participating in the sentencing without objection based on the shortened time period
• rejecting a defendant’s claim that Rule 32 was violated when he and counsel allegedly did not have “in depth” discussions relating to the PSR
• rejecting a defendant’s claim that Rule 32 was violated when he and counsel allegedly did not have \in depth\ discussions relating to the PSR
• upholding denial of a continu- ance where new counsel was given only eight days to prepare for the sentencing hearing
• \[R]ational conduct requires that voluntary responses made by a defendant when entering a guilty plea be binding.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).