United States v. Robert Hutchings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an inmate challenging the manner, location, or conditions of a sentence’s execution must pursue a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
• holding that a federal prisoner challenging the manner, location, or conditions of sentence’s execution must bring a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
• explaining that district court lacked jurisdiction because § 2241 “petition must be filed in the judicial district within which either the [United States Parole Commission] or the prisoner’s custodian is located”
• explaining that district court lacked jurisdiction because § 2241 “petition must be filed in the judicial district within which either the [United States Parole Commission] or the prisoner’s custodian is located”
• “Such an attack on the execution of the sentence is not properly cognizable in a § 2255 motion.”
• “Such an attack on the execution of the sentence is not properly cognizable in a § 2255 motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).