United States v. Robert H. Hopkins, Jr., Morten Hopkins, and John W. Harrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no prejudice from the denial of continuance to obtain documents where the document’s contents were either previously known, available from other sources, or cumulative
• conviction under Sections 1001 and 2(b) upheld where defendant formed political action committee and directly submitted false information to committee treasurer for inclusion in committee report to FEC
• “the misapplication of funds reduced the amount of money available for lawful investment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).