Skip to main content
· 3/31/1986

United States v. Robert H. Fry

Citations

  • 787 F.2d 903
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding convictions under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846 constitutional despite a Ninth Amendment challenge because there is “no fundamental right to produce or distribute [controlled substances] commercially”
  • no fundamental right to \produce or distribute marijuana commercially\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Haynsworth, Warriner, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.