Skip to main content
· 2/17/2004

United States v. Robert H. Frank, Also Known as \Butch\ Frank, United States of America v. Lorin A. Ahlers

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to establish that a district court plainly erred in denying a motion for severance a defendant must first show the trial court abused its discretion
  • concluding “that the evidence of prejudice and abuse of discretion adduced here by [the defendant] has not met this heavy burden”
  • stating that to establish that a district court plainly erred in denying a motion for severance a defendant must first show the trial court abused its discretion
  • enhancement appropriate where defendants “use[d] other individuals and businesses to conduct business on [a defendant‟s] behalf,” as well as a “shell entity”
  • “We review the imposition of the enhancement for clear error. . . . We extend great deference to the district court’s decision to grant an enhancement for obstruction of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Heaney, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.