United States v. Robert G. Eyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “carried” a firearm located in his vehicle’s console
• stating that the presence of a loaded gun in a car’s front console constituted “carrying” under § 924(c)
• where district court failed to specify issues for which it granted a CAPP in accordance with 28 U.S.C. S 2253(c)(2), court of appeals entertained appeal on merits because, inter alia, the reason court issued a CAPP was obvious
• gun within reach inside passenger compartment of car satisfies \carry\ element of section 924(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).