United States v. Robert Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This court has repeatedly held that unless a defendant objects to a specific factual allegation contained in the PSR, the court may accept that fact as true for sentencing purposes” (quoting United States v. Oaks, 606 F.3d 530, 541 (8th Cir. 2010))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).