United States v. Robert Ersel Coney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employee of armored-car company was “connected with” bank
• employee of armored car company responsible for transporting bank’s currency captured by § 656’s broad language
• defendant is not entitled to a particularly worded instruction
• applying clearly erroneous standard to sentence enhancements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).