Skip to main content
· 12/22/1988

United States v. Robert Ernest Detrich, Ahmad Shah Nusraty and Mohammad Dawood Nusraty, Robert Ernest Detrich

Citations

  • 865 F.2d 17
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 528
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 17798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where, as here, the statement is offered as circumstantial evidence of . . . state of mind, it does not fall within the definition given by Rule 801(c); because it was not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Kearse, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.