United States v. Robert Emerson Ezzell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where evidence of guilt is overwhelming, M.R.E. 404(b) error was harmless
• Rule 404(b) incorrectly invoked where points of similarity between bank robberies were ones so common to most bank robberies as to be “entirely unhelpful”
• conduct of two robberies was not sufficiently “peculiar, unique or bizarre”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).