United States v. Robert Elia Iannelli, A/K/A Bobby I

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a handwriting expert’s testimony that the Attorney General’s initials were forged on a memorandum authorizing electronic surveillance of the defendant was not “newly discovered” evidence for Rule 33 purpose where the authorization was “warmly contested”
• holding that a handwriting expert’s testimony that the Attorney General’s initials were forged on a memorandum authorizing electronic surveillance of the defendant was not “newly discovered” evidence for Rule 33 purpose where the authorization was “warmly contested”
• listing the requirements a defendant must meet before he may be granted a new trial under Rule 33

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).