United States v. Robert E. Douglas, Jr., Noel Lussier v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he government’s position is substantially justified under the EAJA when it is justified to a degree that would satisfy a reasonable person—i.e., when it has a reasonable basis in both law and fact”
• \Congress therefore viewed a [ section] 853(n) hearing as a species of an 'action at law or equity'-a substitute for separate civil litigation against the government.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).