United States v. Robert Dice,defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that violation of knock- 29 and-announce rule during execution of valid search warrant warranted suppression of evidence seized in search following violation
• holding that violation of knock-and-announce rule during No. 03-3989 United States v. Jenkins, et al. Page 7 execution of valid search warrant precluded application of the independent source rule to evidence seized in search following violation
• rejecting inevitable discovery in \knock and announce\ violation case where there was no evidence of a properly conducted investigation that would have led to the same evidence
• rejecting inevitable discovery in \knock and announce\ violation case where there was no evidence of a properly con- ducted investigation that would have led to the same evidence
• absent exigent circumstances, “it is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment for an officer to enter a dwelling without first knocking and announcing his presence and authority”
• “‘independent source doctrine’ deems evidence admissible in those situations where an illegal search takes place at some point during a criminal investigation, but where a proper, independent search led to the evidence in question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).