United States v. Robert Dezarn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering defendant’s argument that his conviction for perjury should be reversed because the government did not present sufficient evidence at trial to sustain a finding that his allegedly false statements were material
• jury must be allowed to consider “evidence of the context of the questioning which would establish that the [defendant — despite the false premise of the question — knew exactly what the questions meant and exactly what they were referring to”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).