United States v. Robert David Sirois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that § 2251(a) is constitutionally suspect unless a “commercial purpose” requirement is engrafted onto it
• “There is undoubtedly an active component to the notion of ‘use.’ But that component is fully satisfied for the purposes of the child pornography statute if a child is photographed in order to create pornography.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• United States v. Lebowitz
  Eleventh Circuit· 2012-04-05· cited 151×
• United States v. Peter Leslie and Roland Williams
  Second Circuit· 1997-01-08· cited 126×
• United States v. Anthony Griffith and Christopher Griffith
  Second Circuit· 2002-03-21· cited 123×
• United States v. Meacham
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-06-24· cited 121×
• United States v. Anthony Palomino-Coronado
  Fourth Circuit· 2015-11-05· cited 67×
• United States v. Scott Hayward
  Third Circuit· 2004-03-05· cited 64×
• United States v. Broxmeyer
  Second Circuit· 2010-08-03· cited 44×
• United States v. Major Glenn Farrish, AKA Glenn, AKA Glenn Farrish
  Second Circuit· 1997-08-27· cited 42×
• United States v. Vargas-Cordon
  Second Circuit· 2013-08-12· cited 40×
• United States v. Raplinger
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-02-11· cited 39×
• United States v. Robert Randall Reinhart
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-01-14· cited 37×
• United States v. Thomas Wright
  Sixth Circuit· 2014-12-23· cited 36×
• United States v. Fadl
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-08-21· cited 34×
• Ortiz-Graulau v. United States
  First Circuit· 2014-06-20· cited 32×
• United States v. Thompson
  Second Circuit· 2018-07-13· cited 31×
• United States v. Ortiz-Graulau
  First Circuit· 2008-05-20· cited 30×
• United States v. Fifer
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-07-17· cited 30×
• United States v. Michael Laursen
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-01-30· cited 28×
• United States v. Joseph Vanhorn
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-01-10· cited 27×
• United States v. Charles Hillie
  D.C. Circuit· 2021-09-17· cited 27×

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bailey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
• United States v. Lopez
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 3,052×
• Smith v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 1,468×
• United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. Film
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 524×
• United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson Frias
  Second Circuit· 1993-03-25· cited 425×
• United States v. George Robert Bell
  Fourth Circuit· 1993-09-13· cited 385×
• Cleveland v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-12-16· cited 253×
• Mortensen v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1944-05-22· cited 180×
• United States v. Ramon Martinez
  Second Circuit· 1995-05-09· cited 153×
• United States v. James E. Smith
  Ninth Circuit· 1986-07-29· cited 115×
• Wilson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1914-02-24· cited 98×
• Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian Tribe
  Supreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 75×
• United States v. Harvey Johnpoll
  Second Circuit· 1984-06-18· cited 71×
• United States v. Edward B. Ellis, A/K/A Rocco Ellis
  First Circuit· 1991-05-31· cited 70×
• Raven's Hollow, Ltd. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-27· cited 70×
• United States v. Edward Wray Crockett, Jr., Edward Wray Crockett, Iii, Pleasant Henry Partin, Marcus Randolph Martin, and Edwin Eugene Brown
  Fifth Circuit· 1975-03-04· cited 48×
• Dunn v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1951-06-28· cited 39×
• Barnett v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-11-27· cited 33×
• United States v. Charles Kemp Drury
  Eighth Circuit· 1978-09-05· cited 32×
• United States v. David James Carr
  Second Circuit· 1989-07-25· cited 32×